 
 
 
 
 
   
WFCAM is under construction at the United Kingdom Astronomy Technology Centre (UKATC) in Edinburgh, and is scheduled to be delivered to Hawaii in September 2003. The project scientist is Mark Casali, and the Project Manager is Dave Lunney. The work is undertaken in collaboration with the Joint Astronomy Centre (JAC), who operate UKIRT, and in part through an MOU with Japan, who are providing some of the detector arrays. WFCAM should start regular science operations at the beginning of 2004. The project website is at http://www.roe.ac.uk/atc/projects/wfcam, and a summary of current status is in a recent SPIE paper[1].
WFCAM has the widest field of view of any IR camera so far attempted, and being 
placed on a 4m class telescope, is fast enough to make to large deep IR surveys that 
are a scientific match to optical surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey 
(SDSS). It is based on a novel 
optical design using a quasi-Schmidt camera placed forward of Cassegrain focus that 
gives a 1 diameter field of view. It will be used in conjunction with 
UKIRT's  tip-tilt secondary, which primarily corrects for wind-shake and dome seeing 
and is 
expected to deliver median seeing of 0.4
  diameter field of view. It will be used in conjunction with 
UKIRT's  tip-tilt secondary, which primarily corrects for wind-shake and dome seeing 
and is 
expected to deliver median seeing of 0.4
 across the whole of this field of 
view. The camera employs four Rockwell PACE 2048
 across the whole of this field of 
view. The camera employs four Rockwell PACE 2048 HgCdTe arrays operating across 
the JHK 
spectral region, with 0.4
 HgCdTe arrays operating across 
the JHK 
spectral region, with 0.4
 pixels, and placed at 90% spacing, giving an 
instantaneous coverage of 0.19 sq.deg. Figure 1 shows the footprint on the sky 
compared with other IR cameras, which spells out what a radical advance WFCAM is, 
especially bearing in mind that the 2MASS detectors are on a telescope with an order 
of magnitude less collecting area than UKIRT.
 pixels, and placed at 90% spacing, giving an 
instantaneous coverage of 0.19 sq.deg. Figure 1 shows the footprint on the sky 
compared with other IR cameras, which spells out what a radical advance WFCAM is, 
especially bearing in mind that the 2MASS detectors are on a telescope with an order 
of magnitude less collecting area than UKIRT. 
The pixel size of WFCAM is somewhat undersampled with respect to the expected median 
seeing, but micro-stepping, as employed successfully with 2MASS, can produce 
well-sampled images. It will be possible to dither/mosaic WFCAM in a variety of 
ways, but a standard filled-in ``tile'' can be made by making 2 2 micro-steps 
and 2
2 micro-steps 
and 2 2 macro-steps, resulting in a final image with 0.2
2 macro-steps, resulting in a final image with 0.2
 pixels and 
diameter 0.87
pixels and 
diameter 0.87 , including small overlap regions that are observed more than 
once. In the K-band, exposures will not be more than
, including small overlap regions that are observed more than 
once. In the K-band, exposures will not be more than  10 sec in order to avoid 
sky saturation, and this is likely to be taken as a standard stare time. Very little 
time is lost between micro-steps, but the macro-steps use telescope movement and 
involve a finite time to settle. With a standard 10 sec exposure, we expect the net 
observing efficiency to be
 10 sec in order to avoid 
sky saturation, and this is likely to be taken as a standard stare time. Very little 
time is lost between micro-steps, but the macro-steps use telescope movement and 
involve a finite time to settle. With a standard 10 sec exposure, we expect the net 
observing efficiency to be  65%. The complete filled-in tile with sixteen 
separate exposures therefore takes approximately four minutes. Given the well known 
UKIRT performance and the expected throughput of WFCAM, then for point sources and 
an assumed seeing of 0.4
 65%. The complete filled-in tile with sixteen 
separate exposures therefore takes approximately four minutes. Given the well known 
UKIRT performance and the expected throughput of WFCAM, then for point sources and 
an assumed seeing of 0.4
 , and to a sensitivity of 5
, and to a sensitivity of 5 , we expect to 
reach a depth of K=18.4 in such a four minute observation - fifty times deeper than 
the 2MASS survey. In a ten hour night, and allowing two hours for calibration, one 
could survey 115 square degrees.
, we expect to 
reach a depth of K=18.4 in such a four minute observation - fifty times deeper than 
the 2MASS survey. In a ten hour night, and allowing two hours for calibration, one 
could survey 115 square degrees.
 
 
 
 
