Next: Hardware/software requirements
Up: VISTA and WFCAM data
Previous: Survey progess Databases
Most of the likely requirements for an advanced dynamic processing system
stem from the necessary combinatorial operations that will be required
on images/catalogues derived from basic calibrated science survey products.
The more important and obvious of these have been grouped into clearly
defined interrelated packages and are outlined below.
- Many advanced survey products are predicated on the ability to automatically
generate detailed well-sampled PSFs as a function of position over each
basic product image. Example uses of accurate PSFs are: optional automated
PSF fitting to improve s:n of point sources particularly in crowded stellar
regions; and adaptive kernel matching of PSFs for difference imaging for
transient event detection (SNe, planetary transits, solar system objects).
- A related, but functionally separate issue, is how to optimally stack images
taken at different times in (necessarily) different seeing conditions.
This will involve assessing various stacking techniques where optimality
may well depend on the science aims for the stacked data and may well
delve deeply into (CPU intensive) image restoration techniques.
- Producing contiguous tiled regions and seamless overlap-calibrated large
area catalogues. These and the preceding item could be initiated
automatically from a DataBase-driven list of survey fields and survey
progress eg. is it worth (re)stacking (re)mosaicing (re)calibrating
this region ?
- Detection and parameterisation of Low Surface Brightness objects and an
investigation of more general purpose image detection methodology that
is not just optimised to find faint PSF-like images.
- Matching/merging frames in different passbands and for use in defining
master catalogues for any given field for list-driven co-located photometry
(cf. SDSS and their ability to measure fluxes and limits to fluxes in a
consistent way).
Several of these items particularly PSF-based operations involving optimal
stacking are research areas in their own right and could profitably be pursued
as collaborative research projects. We have asked for a further 1 FTE/yr
of research effort in our bid mainly for progressing these and related
issues. As a further example of this we have already
held fruitful meetings with the Subaru Supercomputing Group in Hilo who
are keen to investigate alternative (and necessarily compute intensive)
methods for optimal stacking of images taken in varying seeing conditions.
Next: Hardware/software requirements
Up: VISTA and WFCAM data
Previous: Survey progess Databases
Nigel Hambly
2002-08-23